The attorneys at the Hoyer Law Group are aggressive advocates for whistleblowers. Whether you are contemplating blowing the whistle on illegal activity or experiencing retaliation for taking a stand, we can help.

Our attorneys have experience litigating a wide variety of whistleblower matters ranging from reporting healthcare fraud and obtaining rewards for recouping money stolen from the government to ending illegal pollution and protecting the careers of federal employees who seek to stop fraud, waste, abuse, and gross mismanagement.

Types of Fraud Reported By Whistleblowers

Potential whistleblowers should keep in mind that there are many arenas for False Claims Act fraud besides the highest-profile ones involving Medicare and defense industry contracting like off-label marketing and prescription drug sales. Federal student loan and financial aid programs, which include Pell grants, Stafford loans and PLUS loans, continue to be another area ripe for abuse and one in which our firm has specific expertise.

How We Help

We can help you navigate the complex web of state and federal whistleblower laws. We are your advocate every step of the way. We can help you make anonymous disclosures to agencies and inspectors general, represent your interests before the Office of Special Counsel or Department of Justice, and of course, fight for you in the courtroom.

Many potential whistleblowers and their lawyers believe all they need to do is file a complaint, and then sit back and wait to receive a big check. Unfortunately, it does not happen that way. After you file a whistleblower lawsuit, the government assigns it to a government lawyer who has numerous other assignments on his or her desk.

You need someone who can get your case to the top of the pile. Hoyer Law Group’s attorneys leverage their decades of experience to turn your knowledge into results in a whistleblower complaint. Our law firm is uniquely qualified to enhance your whistleblower case’s likelihood of success as our attorneys have litigated big cases before and our investigative team knows how to prove fraud in a persuasive manner.

Our team’s expert knowledge of how the system works and how to get the government’s interest makes a huge difference when it counts most. Our attorneys have worked with Assistant United States Attorneys and regulators across the nation, developing invaluable relationships with them along the way. These relationships and the proper presentation of your evidence is crucial to convincing the government to intervene. More than 90% of all whistleblower recoveries come from intervened cases so the importance of this part of the process cannot be overstated.

Further, we know the settlement or verdict is not the last step for you. If we file a False Claims Act case on your behalf, we will pursue the highest possible reward should there be a recovery. Our attorneys have successfully litigated relator’s share disputes in federal court and defended the awards on appeal.

Our Methods Get Results

Over their careers, Hoyer Law Group’s attorneys have helped recover hundreds of millions of dollars for the government and expose some of the worst actors in the whistleblower fraud arena. Read more about our attorneys’ accomplishments in the About Us section or just give us a call if you think you have a case.

“Thank you for your tremendous help settling this case and helping me to move on with my life. Without your guidance, diligence and hard word, I’m sure we could not have close this chapter. I appreciate your hard work and would like to express my deep gratitude – thank you for being on my team.”

Former Client

Frequently Asked Questions

  • I know an individual or a company that is committing fraud. Can I file a False Claims Act case?

    Companies commit a lot of types of fraud, but the False Claims Act targets fraud explicitly against the government or a government program. Put another way, the scam must include making or using a false record or statement to get money from the government. There may be other remedies if you know of fraud against non-government individuals or entities, but the False Claims Act only addresses fraud involving government funds.

  • What if I work for a publicly-traded company that is committing fraud, but the government is not the victim?

    The Securities and Exchange Commission’s whistleblower program went into effect in August 2011 to encourage the reporting of any securities violation. If you are aware of a publicly-traded company that is committing securities fraud such as insider trading, hiding negative information from the public or filing false statements, you may qualify for an award if you report information to the SEC that leads to a recovery of more than one million dollars from the offending company. For more information about filing an SEC whistleblower claim, click here.

  • What does a False Claims Act case involve?

    An individual files a False Claims Act case to return funds to the government. The whistleblower first notifies the government about the fraud and discloses that he or she is going to file a False Claims Act case. After that, the individual files the court case and serves it on the United States and any states that may be involved.

    After a period of investigation, the government has a choice to intervene or decline. If the government intervenes, it will take the lead on settlement negotiations or taking the case to trial. If the government declines, the individual who brought the case may choose to move forward on his or her own. If the case moves forward, the government always has the option to change its mind and intervene at a later date.

    It is important to remember that in any False Claims Act case, the United States is the “real party in interest,” which means that the case is really about the government’s interests, not the interests of the person who files the suit. The whole purpose of the matter is to return money fraudulently obtained from the government.

  • What does qui tam mean?

    People often refer to False Claims Act cases as “qui tam” cases. Qui tam is short for the Latin phrase, “qui tam pro domino rege quam pro se ipso in hac parte sequit,” which roughly translates as “he who brings an action for the king as well as for himself.” The phrase means that an individual brings a qui tam case on behalf of the government.

  • What is a relator?

    Usually, the person who brings a lawsuit is called a plaintiff. In a qui tam case, this person is called a relator.

  • Is there a time limitation on when I can file a case?

    It is essential to file a case as soon as possible after you have learned about fraud. The False Claims Act says that whistleblower must file a lawsuit within:

    • Six years from the date of the violation; or
    • Three years from the date the government knew or should have known about the fraud but in no event more than ten years from the time of the violation, whichever is the latest.

    For example, if a fraudulent action occurred four years ago, a suit can still be filed. Also, if the activity occurred seven years ago, but the government does not and could not have known about it until now, then the statute of limitations has not expired, and you can file a lawsuit.

    However, if the action occurred eleven years ago, the statute of limitations has expired, and it is too late to file a suit. Also, if the activity occurred eight years ago, but the government knew or should have known about it five years ago, then the statute of limitations has run, and a suit is prohibited.

  • If I file a case, will my company know about it? Will they know I’m the one who filed it?

    Not right away, but eventually. All qui tam cases are filed “under seal,” which means that the defendant company does not get served (given a copy of the lawsuit), and the lawsuit is not made public. The case is required by law to stay under seal for at least sixty days while the government investigates, but often the government will make requests to the court for the seal to be extended for months or even years while the investigation continues.

    The court will only lift the seal and make the lawsuit public once the investigation is complete, and the government has decided whether or not to move forward. With minimal exceptions, this is when the court reveals the relator’s name.

  • Can I tell my family/friends/co-workers/bosses that I filed this case?

    No, the seal applies to you too! Only the relator, the relator’s counsel, the court, and the government may know about the case while the seal is in place. A court may dismiss a case you violate this rule, so it is vital to follow it carefully. As a general rule, you should not discuss a False Claims Act lawsuit with anyone other than your lawyers.

  • Are there any protections if my company retaliates against me because I filed this lawsuit?

    Yes, the False Claims Act has special provisions to protect whistleblowers against retaliation. An employee may bring a lawsuit against an employer if the employee is discharged, demoted, suspended, threatened, harassed, or discriminated against because of any lawful acts done by the employee in furtherance of a False Claims Act case. The employee may seek reinstatement, two times the amount of back pay plus interest, and special damages, which include attorney’s fees.

    However, this is an after-the-fact provision. The law does not force employers to rehire employees during the case. The employee only receives the law’s protection if he or she shows that the employer retaliated because of the qui tam action

  • Am I legally a whistleblower?

    A whistleblower is an employee or contractor who discloses fraud, unlawful acts, or certain other types of misconduct to their employer or the relevant regulatory agency.  Federal and state laws vary, but in general, if you are aware that your employer or even a competitor is doing illegal things, you should contact an attorney immediately and ask for guidance on how to properly and effectively blow the whistle to ensure you receive the best protection available in your jurisdiction.

  • I think there might be another case about this. Does that matter?

    The False Claims Act includes a provision that is commonly called the “first-to-file bar.” That means that only the first person to file a case alleging a specific type of fraud can maintain the matter. There is an extensive body of law discussing how similar two cases must be for the second one to be barred, so it is essential to talk to a lawyer about any other cases that might exist.

    Because of this part of the statute, filing a qui tam case can be a race to the courthouse. For this reason, it is crucial to get a case on file as soon as possible.

  • I heard about the fraud in publicly available information; can I still file a case about this?

    There is a provision in the False Claims Act called the “public disclosure bar,” which prohibits suits based on information that is already in the public domain and available to the government. The purpose is to discourage “parasitic” whistleblowers who only know about information second-hand and do not have unique, personal knowledge to help the government in a recovery.

    Congress amended this part of the statute to bar any case wherein the “allegations or transactions” were disclosed in a federal criminal, civil or administrative hearing in which the government was a party; in a congressional, GAO or another federal report, hearing, audit or investigation; or in the news media.

    The exception to this rule is if the relator is an original source of the information. An “original source” is someone who voluntarily disclosed the information to the government before the public disclosure or who has “knowledge that is independent of and materially adds to the publicly disclosed allegations or transactions.”

    Like the first-to-file bar, this requires a very case-specific analysis, so it’s important to discuss this with a lawyer.

  • Once I file my case, who will investigate my claims?

    Typically, the government will assign each to an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) in the jurisdiction where you filed, and an attorney or agent from the United States Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. There may also be representatives from various governmental agencies involved, depending on the nature of the allegations. For example, the Department of Health and Human Services

    may be included in Medicare or Medicaid fraud cases, while the Department of Defense may be involved in defense contracting fraud.

    Once you file a case, the government determines the investigation’s course. The government may ask the relator for help as the case progresses, but all strategic decision-making is up to the government agents assigned to the case. The relator’s role can vary greatly depending on the relator’s employment status and the investigation’s depth. For example, the government may ask a relator to provide a potential witness list, to analyze documents, or even to wear a wire to record conversations.

  • What can happen to the company if the case is successful?

    The False Claims Act provides for a civil penalty of three times the total amount of damages suffered by the government plus hefty statutory fines for each and every false claim. Every individual statement, bill, or record sent to the government in violation of the False Claims Act counts as a separate false claim.

    A company may also be liable for criminal penalties against the company or against individuals who orchestrated and directed the fraud. Criminal penalties can be in the form of fines, asset forfeiture, or even jail time.

    In the most severe cases, a company may face prohibition from future government contracting. For example, the government may exclude a medical provider from participating in the Medicare and Medicaid programs or disbar a defense contractor. The duration or permanency of these sanctions depends on the nature and severity of the fraud.

    If a Defendant settles with the government, the penalties are often negotiated downwards in exchange for the company’s cooperation. Usually, a settling company will also be required to enter into a Corporate Integrity Agreement to allow for government oversight to ensure compliance in the future.

  • How will I get paid for my role in this case?

    If a case is settled or successfully litigated, the relator who initiated the lawsuit is entitled to a “Relator’s share,” which is a portion of the government’s recovery. The relator’s share amount depends on the involvement of the relator, the government, and the ultimate resolution of the case.

    If the government intervenes, the relator is entitled to between 15% and 25% of the proceeds. If the government declines, the law increases the relator’s share to between 25% to 30% of the government’s recovery.

    However, the court may significantly reduce or eliminate the relator’s share if the relator was an architect of the fraud or substantially participated in it. If the relator is ultimately convicted of criminal conduct related to the allegations, he or she must be dismissed from the case and cannot share in the proceeds at all.

    Importantly, a relator will not collect any portion of a relator’s share until the government resolves the case and receives its funds. There is no provision for payment to the relator while the case is ongoing

    Importantly, a Relator will not collect any portion of a Relator’s share until the case is finally resolved and the government has received its funds. There is no provision for payment to the Relator while the case is ongoing.

  • Do I have a whistleblower case?

    While federal and state laws vary by jurisdiction, most whistleblower cases require that you prove that you disclosed what you reasonably believed was fraud or unlawful conduct to your employer (and in some cases, the laws protect independent contractors) and that you employer retaliated against you in response (such as demoting you, removing your job duties, or terminating you).  If you feel you have a case, we suggest that you call a lawyer immediately.

  • What is the difference between a whistleblower and an informant?

    A whistleblower discloses fraud or illegal conduct through proper channels while following the laws in doing so.  Whistleblowers are entitled to many protections provided by law.  Informants, or “leakers,” often publish information that is confidential without permission and without going through proper channels – you could classify people such as Edward Snowden and Julian Assange as “leakers.”  Individuals like Snowden and Assange do not have the same protections as whistleblower because they violated numerous criminal statues and did not follow proper channels in disclosing the information.

  • What should you do to become a whistleblower?

    You should disclose fraud or unlawful through the proper channels and then contact a lawyer. It is also important to write down everything you’ve observed and gather evidence of the fraud to the extent your legally able to obtain it. Contemporaneous notes can become crucial to making your case down the road.

  • I want to move forward. What can I expect next?

    Our firm ensures the accuracy and viability of a case before filing by gathering the facts. We also know that we need to get your claim filed as quickly as possible, so you can expect things to move rather quickly. You may meet with your attorneys and our investigators several times to review documents and evidence to create an in-depth timeline of events and to make sure that there are no stones left unturned.

    Once we file your case, you will begin to prepare for your first meeting with the government, which often takes place within the first few months. At that meeting, the government will want to know everything you know about the case, so you must be prepared. We will meet in advance to ensure you are completely ready.

    After the relator’s meeting, you may feel like the case is slowing down. The government takes over the investigation to determine the accuracy of your allegations and whether they want to proceed with the matter. This period can be long or short and can involve a lot of communication with the government or almost none at all. The most important thing you can do is to be patient. Our firm will work to ensure the case moves as quickly as possible and will keep you notified each step of the way.

    After the Relator’s meeting, you may feel like the case is slowing down. In reality, the baton has been passed to the government and they will be conducting an investigation to determine the accuracy of your allegations and whether they want to proceed with the case. This period of time can be long or short and can involve a lot of communication with the government or almost none at all. The most important thing you can do is to be patient. The James Hoyer firm will work to ensure the case moves as quickly as possible and will keep you notified each step of the way.

  • How long will the case take?

    The length of a False Claims Act case can vary greatly. Although there is a recent push by the Department of Justice to move cases along more quickly, a Relator should expect his or her case to last for several years. A lawsuit typically lasts years and, in some cases, more than a decade depending on the allegation’s complexity, the company’s size, and the government’s motivation. There is simply no way to predict this at the outset.